Morehead State
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
490  Zach Elliott SR 32:58
588  Jesse Moreno SO 33:09
752  Gary Monroe JR 33:28
835  Chase Ratliff SR 33:36
1,520  Evan Childers SO 34:34
2,177  Desmond Bell JR 35:40
2,565  Landon Meserve FR 36:35
2,581  Jeremy Ruppert FR 36:40
2,883  Jordan Whitehair FR 37:53
National Rank #125 of 311
Southeast Region Rank #17 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 17th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.4%
Top 20 in Regional 93.5%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Zach Elliott Jesse Moreno Gary Monroe Chase Ratliff Evan Childers Desmond Bell Landon Meserve Jeremy Ruppert Jordan Whitehair
Greater Louisville Classic (Gold) 10/05 1121 32:46 33:11 33:26 33:44 34:49 35:54 36:32 36:30 37:53
Ohio Valley Championship 11/02 1141 33:25 33:00 33:41 33:37 34:33 35:17 36:40 36:41
Southeast Region Championships 11/15 1116 32:52 33:16 33:20 33:24 34:19 35:46 36:56





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 16.6 484 0.1 0.4 1.0 2.6 5.1 8.8 13.2 17.9 19.2 13.1 7.6 4.7 3.1 1.9 0.9 0.4 0.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Zach Elliott 56.2 0.1 0.1
Jesse Moreno 67.2
Gary Monroe 88.6
Chase Ratliff 96.6
Evan Childers 156.2
Desmond Bell 217.8
Landon Meserve 245.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 0.1% 0.1 9
10 0.4% 0.4 10
11 1.0% 1.0 11
12 2.6% 2.6 12
13 5.1% 5.1 13
14 8.8% 8.8 14
15 13.2% 13.2 15
16 17.9% 17.9 16
17 19.2% 19.2 17
18 13.1% 13.1 18
19 7.6% 7.6 19
20 4.7% 4.7 20
21 3.1% 3.1 21
22 1.9% 1.9 22
23 0.9% 0.9 23
24 0.4% 0.4 24
25 0.0% 0.0 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0